tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3322141.post2159858050727620609..comments2023-10-24T23:22:27.416+10:00Comments on More News: No Crappy WrappersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3322141.post-50455148021621276232008-02-10T17:39:00.000+10:002008-02-10T17:39:00.000+10:00I agree, information needs to be captured in it's ...I agree, information needs to be captured in it's semantic representation further up the stack. Else, we are just transforming relational information to ontological. Why not start with ontological?<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://semantisize.com" REL="nofollow">more on semantic technology</A>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04890038790276951269noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3322141.post-69451981425951691742008-02-08T10:39:00.000+10:002008-02-08T10:39:00.000+10:00So why would I pick SW technologies over Web techn...So why would I pick SW technologies over Web technologies then? You're trying to replace the Web wrappers with SW wrappers. You can't make the same argument - you have to make a better argument. Otherwise you're just trying to replace one wrapper technology with another. You have to show why you would pick one over the other.Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00667948202593884438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3322141.post-5800391979160850842008-02-07T19:20:00.000+10:002008-02-07T19:20:00.000+10:00The WWW is just a bunch of wrappers around databas...The WWW is just a bunch of wrappers around databases. Seems quite successful as an integration technology. I think that a similar argument can be made for the SW.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02190484170646718345noreply@blogger.com